All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "Markus Törnqvist" <mjt@nysv.org>
Cc: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>,
	Pierre Etchemaite <petchema@concept-micro.com>,
	reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: reiserfs3, rsync and hardlinks
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:24:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42093C07.4010804@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050208094257.GX26192@nysv.org>

Reiser4 CPU usage is reasonable now I think.  If you experience that it 
is too high, use the extents only mount option, and it should be pretty 
good.  Maybe somebody has some time to create some numbers?  I could be 
wrong, but let us look at numbers.....

Hans

Markus Törnqvist wrote:

>
>  
>
>>Think I remember some other filesystem being really lightweight CPU.
>>UFS or something.  But XFS shouldn't be too bad.  Where does your
>>"probably" come from?
>>    
>>
>
>UFS as in Unix File System? Eww..
>
>Dunno about CPU usage, but I tested XFS once and it was painfully slow.
>Fortunately it got better, so maybe my test was somewhat flawed.
>
>Maybe the Namesys guys would want to release some new and up-to-date
>benchmarks now that the AMD64 panic bug is fixed?
>
>  
>


  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-08 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-06  2:41 reiserfs3, rsync and hardlinks Pierre Etchemaite
2005-02-06 19:18 ` David Masover
2005-02-06 21:55   ` Pierre Etchemaite
2005-02-07  5:33     ` David Masover
2005-02-08  9:42       ` mjt
2005-02-08 22:24         ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2005-02-07 10:22 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-02-07 20:50   ` Pierre Etchemaite
2005-02-07 21:32     ` Chris Mason
2005-02-08  5:53       ` David Masover
2005-02-08 22:14       ` Hans Reiser
2005-02-09  8:28         ` Pierre Etchemaite
2005-02-08 11:16     ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-02-09  8:22       ` Pierre Etchemaite
2005-02-07 19:26 ` Hans Reiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42093C07.4010804@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=mjt@nysv.org \
    --cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
    --cc=petchema@concept-micro.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.