From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyvLR-0007o9-1P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:09:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyvLN-0007mX-Qr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:09:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyvLN-0007lx-Jf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:09:37 -0500 Received: from [195.250.128.75] (helo=smtp2.vol.cz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cyv4e-0001PW-6r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:52:20 -0500 Message-ID: <420A3FAD.5090605@volny.cz> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:51:57 +0100 From: Filip Navara MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] amd64 progress References: <1107963684.4949.43.camel@dhcp113.oversighttech.com> In-Reply-To: <1107963684.4949.43.camel@dhcp113.oversighttech.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030209040103010906030204" Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: matthew.daniel@oversightsystems.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030209040103010906030204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Daniel wrote: >>I've tried installing the WinXP 64-bit preview under QEMU/x64 on >>Win32. At first I had to add a little hack - hardcoded ACPI table >>- to enable the setup loader to recognize the local APIC. >> >> >Is this change committed to CVS or if not may I ask to see it? > It's a hack and as such it can't really be commited to CVS. The code is attached. >Bochs has >the same problem as my CVS qemu and (at least according to their mailing >list) they are stumped about how to get around this issue. > > I've made a similar hack to Bochs while testing... I do not intend to share the source since it's even uglyier than the QEMU one, sorry. With the hack Win64 under Bochs get about to the same point as in QEMU. There seem to be some problems with segment limit checks in the x86-64 mode, but I haven't tried to investigate it further... Regards, Filip --------------030209040103010906030204 Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed; name="qemu-acpi-hack.zip " Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="qemu-acpi-hack.zip " UEsDBBQAAAAIAFGMSTIlzVchVwAAABQQAAAIAAAAYWNwaS5iaW7tyjEOQEAURdGvU6ks4Edl AaLSCCIKyZgZ+7cSDCEKes09zUternWtGm+1n7pxVpVUErGt87mIRNl1fqhCV5uhKY6ufLq3 ZT0nDl2YLZB7AQAAAADAb3ZQSwMEFAAAAAgA1YpJMh7MISlBAQAATAcAAAYAAABhY3BpLnPt lN9qgzAUxu8LfYfcCaWs/mPrbVEvCitz6h4gTaOVOS1JHOvb7yyOzLjNNb3wasIXjPI7H+fk 09UCJWkYIy5YS0TLKFqs5rOb/VlQZCXW0kpBIQiBYlAGSuQeAcvLosYDzH7z79DIBRg5UvLM 25e+2SMUjUA70BMISfWph2iHyoPmZNt/ODH6WvKyqTXK8ZeSlWvU3WsUPhwY5Rw1+cd0MgnP Z92ssuGEQlAqJzP0/31C7rpz7a8aVtG6EEe9V+eaXl13urP43tP4WzSsKPC+oqquMakmYMYT RrFoGPhexfVdEVxfFbzg8pxt4m3QdaHSJp/1j2Xz+Q1uQYFB2jx/qrR5t/9pmy5tP9NUrjnV T7ghuJKBUqEzcs8rXHQIbO5VMbOfsTifqE6sxwgVTDOXE2sI9CdHbEbKjoaQc/Fk3gFQSwME FAAAAAgA44xJMvjokLqdAQAAEAMAAAoAAABwYy5jLnBhdGNopVBda9swFH2uwf/hUhgktR3L zlwaj0JK2Fi6ZC0dexayLacXbMuTlDRd2/8+ObJDC+3TDkaS7z3n3I9lU/B9CvcPYZtPcte5 /H+4zt3iF5RY8RTCfKekEDr8w+utPfpS/s51JNcS+Q6bDUhzKRQNRJNp4joFliUEWwhk9w+2 tyAIhkZPogSuWQMxIQlEcUriNDmHgBicWAfP847kGXzjWc89T6cXKYks13XmcwiSKfEvwOuu aArzuetAB8k3qDSXFEUrpKaSs2JE9rPYh+jw2fgsPmR8+Pl7tRp/+UD8IFHzd9U29UpuBgUD LGHU5kh5w7KKF2Mz0ntheDKSAazFnGKDepS3W6rMYitumLvO1xtI4Rl8v1r8SGElWAFXi9sl 6M5rAmfhK1rncJyivX9UmLOK1rwW8tEMwomBD2Qf2UcfgWdY3tD11zW9u1m/KauaVmKjy1G2 LX1Q+JeLw3vsw+knFbK8xUmGzakPGQpFC5Rv5JVplmLNNtwadB1RyWqaMcXBG+ofNS/9Wo4b MZkhouGyO22c7D937fer/wdQSwECFAAUAAAACABRjEkyJc1XIVcAAAAUEAAACAAAAAAAAAAA ACAIAAAAAAAAYWNwaS5iaW5QSwECFAAUAAAACADVikkyHswhKUEBAABMBwAABgAAAAAAAAAA ACAIAAB9AAAAYWNwaS5zUEsBAhQAFAAAAAgA44xJMvjokLqdAQAAEAMAAAoAAAAAAAAAAAAg CAAA4gEAAHBjLmMucGF0Y2hQSwUGAAAAAAMAAwCiAAAApwMAAAAA --------------030209040103010906030204--