From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: saving domains
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:35:50 -0800
Message-ID: <420ABA76.6050301@us.ibm.com>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D12381D@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk> <871xbpcj97.wl@badger.wordzoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <871xbpcj97.wl@badger.wordzoo.com>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
To: Jared Rhine <jared@wordzoo.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jared Rhine wrote:

> Well, maybe.  While "lighter weight" xend would be good, maybe C would
> be a better implementation language for that lightweight tool?  Seems
> like having the fat Python xend implementation use the fat Twisted
> library makes sense...

Jared, think you meant "little sense" ? ;)
But otherwise, I agree. Is anyone tied to python as a solution?
Wouldn't it be better to carve out a more robust alternative
in C?

thanks,
Nivedita


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click