From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcKL-0004fA-2D for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:25 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcKA-0004Yx-IJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcK1-0004TI-60 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcJy-0004Ms-5q for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:02 -0500 Received: from [194.67.23.122] (helo=mx2.mail.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czbry-0000O3-Jj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:34:06 -0500 Received: from [83.77.8.238] (port=4853 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1Czbru-000Q08-00 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:34:03 +0300 Message-ID: <420CC284.1040900@list.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:34:44 +0100 From: Serbinenko Vladimir User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20050207121011.GC1380@mjk.myfqdn.de> <200502102024.08157.okuji@enbug.org> <20050210215112.GE3832@mjk.myfqdn.de> <200502111038.56290.okuji@enbug.org> <20050211120946.GA1290@mjk.myfqdn.de> In-Reply-To: <20050211120946.GA1290@mjk.myfqdn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: Re: [Suggestion] LILO-like direct menu item access && scripting X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:03:18 -0000 Marc-Jano Knopp wrote: >On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 10:38 (+0100), Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > >>On Thursday 10 February 2005 22:51, Marc-Jano Knopp wrote: >> >> >>>But as your mail left a few things open (Select or execute? Normal >>>keys or keys with modifier? Single-letter-keys or strings?), the >>>discussion about this would have had to be continued anyway. :-) >>> >>> >>I prefer to execute it when a shortcut key is pressed. Why not? >> >> > >Because then it would not be possible to edit menu items blindly. >For example, I could not blindly add boot parameters to the Linux >kernel (runlevel, root=, etc.) to override the default >settings (which I do, indeed, e.g. for my SCSI testing machine >which varying disks with varying partition layout connected, so that >fixed menu items don't help). > > > > I think the best choice to do it is to bind a key like C-p to add parameters to the entry. Then theese parameters will be accessible as $1, $2, ... ($0 is a label of menu entry)