From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Czk72-0004W8-H1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:22:13 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Czk6u-0004Rr-2N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:22:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czk6t-0004Og-3d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:22:03 -0500
Received: from [63.240.76.166] (helo=sccimhc92.asp.att.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzjpX-0007AT-3L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:04:07 -0500
Message-ID: <420D39E1.90907@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:04:01 -0500
From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Just a thought (high level API)
References: <1107961744.8824.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0502111319120.18686@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>	<420CF90A.7090507@xtal.rwth-aachen.de>	<200502111830.13786.paul@codesourcery.com>	<1108152236.20337.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20050211165530.5a6335fd.ayerkes@speakeasy.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050211165530.5a6335fd.ayerkes@speakeasy.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: art yerkes <ayerkes@speakeasy.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

art yerkes wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:03:56 -0500
> Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'm curious, does anyone *not* have it already installed?  A simple
>>"locate libglib-2.0" should suffice to tell you.  glib should not have
>>any dependencies itself other than libc and maybe pkg-config.
> 
> 
> Some linux users install up from a small base system.  In such cases
> (like mine) they won't have glib.

I know what building up from a small system is, I'm a gentoo developer 
;) (That is all we ever do).  I think glib gets pulled into our base 
system, but that may be a USE flag thing.

Nathaniel