From: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
To: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@davemloft.net, jmorris@redhat.com,
sds@epoch.ncsc.mil, serue@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <420E77FA.6080007@eurodev.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420E334B.8060805@eurodev.net>
Pablo Neira wrote:
> I also see another option which is passing as parameter such function
> which check for capabilities/audit stuff to my netlink_process_skb
> function, calling it before process_msg. But in that case, the packet
> sent by a sender that doesn't has the right to was already enqueued. I
> understand that this is exactly what you are trying to avoid.
With your patch, a message from user space process that doesn't have the
capabilites follows this path:
sys_sendmsg() -> netlink_sendmsg() -> netlink_unicast() ->
netlink_sendskb() = discarded here.
Currently, it continues, for example in case of rtnetlink:
... -> netlink_sendskb() -> sk_data_ready(sk, len) -> rtnetlink_rcv() ->
rtnetlink_rcv_skb() -> rtnetlink_rcv_msg() = discarded here.
Nowadays the message is enqueued but it's discarded later. So if I'm not
missing anything, I don't see the point of adding a new function to
check for capabilities/audit stuff just a bit before.
--
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-12 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-12 9:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] netlink check sender Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] " Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] netlink check sender, rtnetlink Chris Wright
2005-02-12 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit Pablo Neira
2005-02-12 21:41 ` Pablo Neira [this message]
2005-02-14 13:08 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-15 0:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 2:29 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-15 2:36 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-15 3:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 22:19 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-15 22:22 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 22:27 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-16 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-16 3:42 ` James Morris
2005-02-15 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-14 12:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] netlink check sender Stephen Smalley
2005-02-14 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-15 0:22 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 0:17 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=420E77FA.6080007@eurodev.net \
--to=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.