From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darrio Faggioli Subject: [PATCH] libxl: use xc_topologyinfo to figure out how many CPUs we actually have Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:03:50 +0200 Message-ID: <420c8861a2d2a61a7e80.1336561430@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xen.orgxen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Within libxl_get_cpu_topology(), considering all the CPUs the hypervisor supports to be valid topology entries might lead to misleading and incorrect behaviours, e.g., the output of `xl info -n' below on a 16 cores machine: ... cpu_topology : cpu: core socket node 0: 0 1 0 1: 0 1 0 2: 1 1 0 3: 1 1 0 4: 9 1 0 5: 9 1 0 6: 10 1 0 7: 10 1 0 8: 0 0 1 9: 0 0 1 10: 1 0 1 11: 1 0 1 12: 9 0 1 13: 9 0 1 14: 10 0 1 15: 10 0 1 16: 0 0 0 17: 0 0 0 18: 0 0 0 19: 0 0 0 20: 0 0 0 ... ... 62: 0 0 0 63: 0 0 0 However, xc_topologyinfo() tells us (in max_cpu_index) how many entries arrays it returns corresponds to actually valid CPUs, so let's use that information. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c @@ -2903,7 +2903,8 @@ libxl_cputopology *libxl_get_cpu_topolog } for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) { -#define V(map, i) (map[i] == INVALID_TOPOLOGY_ID) ? \ +#define V(map, i) (i > tinfo.max_cpu_index || \ + map[i] == INVALID_TOPOLOGY_ID) ? \ LIBXL_CPUTOPOLOGY_INVALID_ENTRY : map[i] ret[i].core = V(coremap, i); ret[i].socket = V(socketmap, i);