*Sorry if you get it twice. Looks like I sent from wrong email.*

Harald Welte wrote:

> Please consider / comment the following (untested) patch.

Yes. That's much less complicated than the other proposed patch.

> 
> Not really sure whether nesting the rwlock inside the mutex is that much
> of a good idea... but as the comment indicates, I think it's the best we
> can get.

I think the best we actually can get, is also replacing those rwlock's with
simple lock's. As you said on IRC, that's a bit overkill.

Incremental (also untested, but compiles) patch to your is attached.