Re: xen and virtual iron

[Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>]

Sean Harper wrote:

>At Linuxworld a company called Virtual Iron is demoing a product that,
>like Xen or VMWare, can break physical machines into virtual machines.
>
>However, unlike Xen or VMWare, this product can also aggregate physical
>machines into virtual machines.  In other words, it is possible for the
>user to specify that 3.5 cpus from 2 machines (2 from 1 and 1.5 from
>another) be assigned to a virtual machine. When linux boots on that
>virtual machine it simply looks like a 4 cpu machine (but 1 of the cpus
>is slower). Presumably there is a pretty big performance penalty for
>sharing across machines, which they mitigate to some extent by requiring
>Infiniband.
>
>It seems like most of the tricky work is around caching to optimize the
>performance across the slower communication bus (when sharing between
>machines).
>  
>
Hmm, sounds like a NUMA system, with a relatively low throughput and 
high latency interconnect.   Not sure if anyone would want to do this on 
a workload where performance matters.

I suppose with a layer of abstraction like Xen, doing something like 
this is feasible.  You could leverage the NUMA code in the linux kernel, 
but I would think you would need a very highly parallel workload to make 
this effective, and if you have that, a cluster setup would probably 
work just as well anyway.

-Andrew Theurer


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click