From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (outmx005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFBC67A71 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:46:44 +1100 (EST) Received: from outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j1GKkbak027300 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:46:39 +0100 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <4213B111.4050905@246tNt.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:46:09 +0100 From: Sylvain Munaut MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely References: <528646bc05021515486bd9f926@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <528646bc05021515486bd9f926@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Lite5200 full duplex support List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: >I'm using Sylvain's http://bkbits.246tnt.com:14690/linux-2.5-mpc52xx >bk tree on a lite5200 evb. I noticed that the FEC driver is hard >coded to only support half duplex 10/100 auto-negotiation. Is that >intentional? Are there any known problems with running full duplex? > >I modified the code to allow full duplex and I haven't observed any >problems yet. (w/ nfsroot and compiling apps on the target natively) > >Cheers, >g. > >BTW, here's what I changed: >drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/fec_phy.c line 294 (phy_info_lxt971) >from: > { mk_mii_write(MII_REG_ANAR, 0x0A1), NULL }, /* 10/100, HD */ >to: > { mk_mii_write(MII_REG_ANAR, 0x1E1), NULL }, /* 10/100, HD */ > > > I'm not sure actually. I also wondered and forgot to ask the author. I guess I always tought there was a problem with it without checking. Good to know it's working. Thanks Sylvain