From: Daniel Lopes <lopsch@lopsch.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Let me understand *RETURN*
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42163444.70206@lopsch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1108749685.9509.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mohammad Khan schrieb:
> On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:34, Jason Opperisano wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:15:58AM -0500, Mohammad Khan wrote:
>>
>>>I have couple of chains and rules for filter table
>>>
>>>-N TCP_IN
>>>-N TCP_OUT
>>>-N UDP_IN
>>>-N UDP_OUT
>>>-N ICMP_IN
>>>-N ICMP_OUT
>>>
>>>-N P1_IN
>>>-N P1_OUT
>>>-N P2_IN
>>>-N P2_OUT
>>>
>>>-A FORWARD -d IP_OF_P1 -j P1_IN
>>>-A FORWARD -s IP_OF_P1 -j P1_OUT
>>>
>>>-A FORWARD -d IP_OF_P1 -j P1_IN
>>>-A FORWARD -s IP_OF_P1 -j P1_OUT
>>
>>why do you have the above 2 rules twice?
>
> Sorry, copied and pasted ..
> should be
> -A FORWARD -d IP_OF_P1 -j P1_IN
> -A FORWARD -s IP_OF_P1 -j P1_OUT
> -A FORWARD -d IP_OF_P2 -j P2_IN
> -A FORWARD -s IP_OF_P2 -j P2_OUT
>
>
>>
>>>-A FORWARD -j LOG --log-prefix "NOT_FORWARDED "
>>>-A FORWARD -j DROP
>>>
>>>-A P1_IN -t TCP -j TCP_IN
>>>-A P1_IN -t UDP -j UDP_IN
>>>-A P1_IN -t ICMP -j ICMP_IN
>>>-A P1_IN -j RETURN
>>>
>>>-A TCP_IN -t TCP --dport 80 -J ACCPET
>>>-A TCP_IN -j RETURN
>>
>
> Sorry again.. for the typo
>
> should be:
> -A P1_IN -p TCP -j TCP_IN
> -A P1_IN -p UPD -j UDP_IN
> -A P1_IN -p ICMP -j ICMP_IN
> -A P1_IN -j RETURN
>
> -A TCP_IN -p TCP --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> -A TCP_IN -j RETURN
>
>
>>the option to specify the protocol is "-p" not "-t" (that specifies the
>>table to operate on)
>>
>>
>>>For any tcp packet that going to P1 and don't have destination port 80:
>>>
>>>returned to P1_IN chain from TCP_IN chain, then after
>>>returned to FORWARD chain from P1_IN, and finally
>>>dropping the packet after kept log.
>>>
>>>Am I right?
>>
>>yes, assuming the IP P1 is not local to the gateway in question.
>
>
> IP_OF_P1 is local IP.
> I didn't typed rules for P2_IN and P2_OUT
>
>
> I am just trying to understand *RETURN* .
>
> Thanks
> Mohammad
>
>
RETURN only says that you stop testing the packet against the rules in
the actual chain, return back to the outer chain and continue testing
the packet against that rules in the outer chain. E.g.
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -A INPUT -j rule1
iptables -A INPUT -j rule2
iptables -A INPUT -j rule3
iptables -N rule1
iptables -A rule1 -j RETURN
iptables -N rule2
iptables -A rule2 -j RETURN
iptables -N rule3
iptables -A rule3 -j RETURN
So now every packet destined for the local machine always wents through
the INPUT chain. The default policy is set to drop.
Now let´s say there´s a packet for the local machine. It went´s to the
INPUT chain. The INPUT chain sends it to rule1. In rule one the RETURN
traget sends it back to the INPUT chain. The INPUT chain sends it to
rule2. Rule2 sends it back to the INPUT chain and so on till it is
droppped by the default policy.
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -A INPUT -j rule1
iptables -N rule1
iptables -A rule1 -j rule2
iptables -N rule2
iptables -A rule2 -j RETURN
iptables -N rule1
iptables -A rule1 -j RETURN
Again the INPUT chain sends it to rule1. Rule1 sends it to rule2. Rule2
sends it via RETURN back to rule1 and rule1 back to INPUT chain where it
is dropped via default policy.
I hope this will help you. You can see RETURN always sends a packet back
to the outer chain from where it was send to the actual chain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-18 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-18 16:15 Let me understand *RETURN* Mohammad Khan
2005-02-18 17:34 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-02-18 18:01 ` Mohammad Khan
2005-02-18 18:30 ` Daniel Lopes [this message]
2005-02-18 23:59 ` R. DuFresne
2005-02-19 0:40 ` Jason Opperisano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42163444.70206@lopsch.com \
--to=lopsch@lopsch.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.