All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Cc: gp <poppitzg@iomega.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: SATAPI timing
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:15:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4216CB7E.1030109@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001801c5084b$b5687b60$6401a8c0@tw.ibm.com>

Albert Lee wrote:
> I'm a little confused about what is the "correct behavior" of ATAPI DMA INTRQ.
> 
> 1. The ATA-4 flowchart and ATA-6 state diagram seems to be inconsistent.
> In the ATA-4 flowchart, no wait for INTRQ is specified.
> 
> 2. From the ATA-5 errata:
> http://www.t13.org/project/e01122r0.pdf
> 
> "...Page 265 through 270 of NCITS 340-2000 clause 9.8 was not properly converted from the flow
> charts in NCITS 317-1998 to the state diagrams. The state diagrams figures 33 and 34 and
> associated text is modified to indicate that the device interrupts only at command completion. "
> 
> Notice the "device interrupts only at command completion." statement.
> However, the diagrams in the errata are inconsistent with the above statement.
> 
> 3. The ide-cd code does not wait for INTRQ before starting BM-DMA
> 
>         /* Arm the interrupt handler. */
>         ide_set_handler(drive, handler, rq->timeout, cdrom_timer_expiry);
> 
>         /* ATAPI commands get padded out to 12 bytes minimum */
>         cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(rq->cmd[0]);
>         if (cmd_len < ATAPI_MIN_CDB_BYTES)
>             cmd_len = ATAPI_MIN_CDB_BYTES;
> 
>         /* Send the command to the device. */
>         HWIF(drive)->atapi_output_bytes(drive, rq->cmd, cmd_len);
> 
>         /* Start the DMA if need be */
>         if (info->dma)
>             hwif->dma_start(drive);
> 
>         return ide_started;
> 
> 4. My CD-ROM drive does not generate INTRQ after it received the command packet.
>    It only assert DMARQ.
> 
> Maybe the state diagrams in ATA-5 and ATA-6 are incorrect?  Any idea?


As I mentioned in an earlier email, research seems to indicate the 
IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE word 0, bits 6-5 can be used to indicate INTRQ 
will be delivered.  This is consistent with my ATA-4 specification.

Apparently this behavior is obsolete, but we still need to support it.

Thus, libata has a few ATAPI deficiencies that need correcting:

* for one value of word 0, bit 6-5, check for INTRQ bit presence

* for other values of word 0, bit 6-5, we should honor the requested 
delay before checking for DRQ

* guarantee that the total length of an ATAPI DMA transfer is a multiple 
of 4 bytes


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-19  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-28 15:37 SATAPI timing gp
2005-01-28 17:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-01 10:49   ` Albert Lee
2005-02-06 15:17     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-19  5:15     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-02-21  7:54       ` Jens Axboe
2005-02-22  6:33         ` Albert Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4216CB7E.1030109@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=poppitzg@iomega.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.