From: Christian Schmid <webmaster@rapidforum.com>
To: Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@tiscali.de>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421A43BE.6080604@rapidforum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421A4244.9090908@tiscali.de>
netdev@oss.sgi.com has been found in MAINTAINERS in the ipv4/ipv6 section ;)
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Christian Schmid wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering
>> the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at
>> the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, the slowdown
>> appears at around 3000 sockets. With 64 KB, it didnt appear up to 4500
>> sockets where a small slow-down appeared but I think this was a
>> disk-issue. So its definetly something with TCP-memory.
>>
>> But now I hit another BUG: After I have managed to create 4500
>> sockets, 10 minutes later an interesting phenomenon appeared: It locks
>> for 5 seconds every 60 seconds. I first thought this was something in
>> my program but I can do what I want, I wasn't able to fix this. Even a
>> restart of my program didnt help. It even appears with 400
>> connections. Then I despairedly just restarted the system and: It was
>> gone. So what is THIS?
>>
>> Sorry if I am a bit angry. I know you are doing a really good job.
>> Maybe I can donate some money somewhere but PLEASE!!!!! help me fix
>> this bugs.... Thank you.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
> Hi!
> I'm not a Perl Coder or Socket Specialist, but did try an implementation
> of your program in C (maybe it's a perl "bug"?)? And as mentioned in the
> other Thread, try to use send () instead of sendfile (). Anyway it's
> strange. Try to contact some of the Maintainers and Developers of this
> part of the IP v4 implementation in Linux.
>
> Matthias-Christian Ott
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-21 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-21 20:04 ARGH MORE BUGS!!! Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 20:19 ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-21 20:25 ` Christian Schmid [this message]
2005-02-21 20:28 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 20:34 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 20:56 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 21:17 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 21:36 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 22:10 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 23:03 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-22 0:23 ` argh more bugs!!! Francois Romieu
2005-02-22 0:37 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-22 0:10 ` ARGH MORE BUGS!!! Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 21:18 ` Christian Schmid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421A43BE.6080604@rapidforum.com \
--to=webmaster@rapidforum.com \
--cc=matthias.christian@tiscali.de \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.