From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from av.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [12.44.186.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AF467A79 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:32:35 +1100 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (av [127.0.0.1]) by av.mvista.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07167 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:32:34 -0800 Message-ID: <421BC111.1050602@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:32:33 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Embedded PPC Linux list Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040602070105010201070505" Subject: [PATCH} include/asm-ppc/cpu2.h typo List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040602070105010201070505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, This bug/typo was pointed out to me. I looked at the 8260 & 8272 manuals and it should be 0x0002 in both cases. I don't work with the 82[67]x processors but it looks like this would have quickly bit anyone trying even parity on their serial line. Nobody uses even parity on those platforms? Is there something I don't know (and the manual isn't telling me)? Mark --------------040602070105010201070505 Content-Type: text/plain; name="cpm2_1.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cpm2_1.patch" diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/cpm2.h b/include/asm-ppc/cpm2.h --- a/include/asm-ppc/cpm2.h 2005-02-22 16:26:07 -07:00 +++ b/include/asm-ppc/cpm2.h 2005-02-22 16:26:07 -07:00 @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ #define SCU_PSMR_RPM ((ushort)0x000c) #define SCU_PSMR_REVP ((ushort)0x0008) #define SCU_PSMR_TPM ((ushort)0x0003) -#define SCU_PSMR_TEVP ((ushort)0x0003) +#define SCU_PSMR_TEVP ((ushort)0x0002) /* CPM Transparent mode SCC. */ --------------040602070105010201070505--