From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jander Subject: Re: ReiserFS quota and 2.6.10 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:15:24 +0000 Message-ID: <421CD64C.5060803@darthvader.us> References: <20050222201726.31044.qmail@web86510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20050223102811.GC31151@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200502231201.28550.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20050223111346.GA9269@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20050223111346.GA9269@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Jan Kara wrote: >>Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 11:28 schrieb Jan Kara: >> >> >>>>Because I like to keep people happy, especially Valdis >>>>Kletnieks, I'll repost my query from another email >>>>account without a disclaimer..here we go. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> :) The disclaimer was quite longer than the message... >>> >>> >>>>========== >>>> >>>>>>From the subject, you have probably already guessed >>>> >>>>what I am about to ask.. >>>>Is quota working ok with vanilla 2.6.10 with ReiserFS? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, the quota should be working fine - I suggest to wait a bit for >>>2.6.11 as it has fixed some deadlocks in the quota code appearing under >>>high load. >>> >>> >>Is this "fixed" in SLES kernels already? >> >> > These problems are fixed in the current SUSE kernel and hence will be >fixed in 9.3 and newer "products". But it's not in anything older... > > Honza > > Much appreciate it thank you