From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Calculating real cpu usage of Xen domains correctly!
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:44:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421D1575.9000803@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109201371.5459.35.camel@thinkpad>
Jerone Young wrote:
>1) CPU time % measured per domain
>(The differential of cpu usage time / some differential time) x 100
> new_cpu_time-old_cpu_time new_time-old_time
>
>
So for instance, measured over the course of a second, you might get:
Domain-0: 98%
Domain-1: 99%
Domain-2: 0%
Which implies that both Domain-0 and Domain-1 are actively running
Domain-2 is probably blocked on IO. The typical expectation is that the
sum of all the usages is going to be 100%.
>2) Relative usage .. How much of the total of the cpu times is going
>toward a particular domain.
>
>
The idea here is to have a relative measure. So if Domain-0 used 98% of
it's time, and Domain-1 used 99%, then the result is something like:
Domain-0: 49%
Domain-1: 50%
Domain-2: 0%
That looks more right. However, we think that means making assumptions
about the underlying scheduling algorithm (meaning that if the
difference in cpu_time over a period of time is the same for two
domains, that those two domains have gotten the same amount of CPU time).
Any advice or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-23 23:29 Calculating real cpu usage of Xen domains correctly! Jerone Young
2005-02-23 23:44 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-24 0:48 Ian Pratt
2005-02-24 1:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-24 2:10 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-02-25 2:25 ` Matt Ayres
2005-02-25 2:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-25 16:44 ` Rob Gardner
2005-02-25 17:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-24 2:37 Ian Pratt
2005-02-24 3:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-24 13:56 ` John L Griffin
2005-02-24 20:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-24 21:46 ` John L Griffin
2005-02-24 22:02 ` Keir Fraser
2005-02-24 23:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-02-25 3:53 ` John L Griffin
2005-02-25 10:31 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-02-25 10:38 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421D1575.9000803@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jyoung5@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.