From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: dynamic libraries Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:46:35 -0800 Message-ID: <421D23EB.7090603@diku.dk> References: <20050223212813.GA3988@liz.veritas.com> <137edce4961c1b2972cb01dff8265db4@cl.cam.ac.uk> <794420537adac1b4f01e86b86acd4ff1@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <794420537adac1b4f01e86b86acd4ff1@cl.cam.ac.uk> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > Another option is not to bother building dynamic libraries but to > statically link libxc and > libxutil. Avoids versioning problems and it's not like there's some big > sharing win to > be had. Any strong opinions on this? Sounds like a good idea, I have been doing similar stuff for a while, it saves some installation/versioning headaches, though I guess the real win here is if/when the python stuff goes away. Jacob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click