All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rudi Starcevic <tech@wildcash.com>
To: "netfilter@lists.netfilter.org" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Port-forwarding Perfomance
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:29:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <421DE4AF.6040702@wildcash.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109156169.11713.2.camel@nostromo.bgsecm.com>

Hi,

Still having trouble with port-forwarding performance.

As much as I look I can't find anything wrong.

I have one Linux 66.283.12.21 box and one Windows box 192.168.0.10

I can download a file of the linux box at around 140K/s

That very same file on the Windows machine is around 15K/s using DNAT 
and Masq/Forwarding.

I'm very disappointed and did not expect to see anything like this, I 
had more like 10% in mind ...

The linux box is not under heavy load and there is only 431 connections 
being tracked.

Hmm .. I must have a problem else where, it just too hard to believe 
those download rate numbers.


Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez wrote:

>El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 17:33 -0800, Rudi Starcevic escribió:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have www port-forwarding setup and running OK.
>>
>>However I wonder if they way I have configured it is not the most 
>>optimal for speed and performance.
>>
>>I have a default policy of DROP with a total of about 30 rules.
>>
>>These rules below do my www port-forwarding, can you see if there is a 
>>better way to do this ?
>>
>># ENABLE FORWARDING / NAT / MASQUERADING
>>echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>
>># NAT Forwarding Setup
>>$IPTABLES --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface $ETH0 -j 
>>MASQUERADE
>>    
>>
>
>The only thing I can say about your rules it's that if you
>know the firewall IP it's much better to use SNAT than
>MASQUERADE, because you gain some speed with it.
>
>  
>
>>$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $ETH1 -j ACCEPT
>>$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $ETH0 -j ACCEPT
>>$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>>
>># http Port-Forwarding setup
>>$IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $ETH0 -p tcp --dport 80 -d $MEDIA1_IP 
>>-j DNAT --to $MEDIA1_LO:80
>>    
>>
>
>The rule it's OK, I don't know how you can do it better to achieve
>more speed.
>
>  
>
>>Many thanks,
>>Kind regards
>>Rudi
>>    
>>
>
>Regards.
>
>  
>



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005



  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-24 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-24  1:33 Port-forwarding Perfomance Rudi Starcevic
2005-02-23 10:56 ` Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
2005-02-24 14:29   ` Rudi Starcevic [this message]
2005-02-23 20:56     ` Maxime Ducharme
2005-02-23 21:10     ` Jason Opperisano
2005-02-24 16:09       ` Rudi Starcevic
2005-02-24  0:07         ` R. DuFresne
2005-02-25  0:15       ` Rudi Starcevic
2005-02-24 12:53         ` Daniel
2005-03-08 11:12         ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=421DE4AF.6040702@wildcash.com \
    --to=tech@wildcash.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.