From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] random ia64 sched-domains values
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:14:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421EDE70.3010501@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1041 bytes --]
Hi,
These are some values I just found from thin-air that should
hopefully make ia64 work after the latest sched patches.
Though it did look like there may have been some problems with
the old values, which I tried to fix up too:
- SD_ALLNODES_INIT had .balance_interval set a specific way -
this field is internal to the scheduler and will end up
sitting between min_interval and max_interval and not do what
was intended, so tweak max_interval instead.
- SD_ALLNODES_INIT had SD_BALANCE_EXEC set. The scheduler
doesn't cope _really_ well with doing balance-on-exec over the
top level of a multi-level NUMA setup like this. It will tend
to fill up the first CPUs in each high level group (cluster of
6 nodes) rather than spreading the load on a per-node basis.
This could be improved if we really need it, but for now remove
the flag from the top level.
- Increase SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN in the low level NUMA domain so we
still push tasks out a reasonable distance. Set SD_BALANCE_FORK
in this domain too.
Not compiled or tested, sorry.
[-- Attachment #2: sched-tune-ia64.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3409 bytes --]
---
linux-2.6-npiggin/arch/ia64/kernel/domain.c | 2
linux-2.6-npiggin/include/asm-ia64/topology.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/asm-ia64/topology.h~sched-tune-ia64 include/asm-ia64/topology.h
--- linux-2.6/include/asm-ia64/topology.h~sched-tune-ia64 2005-02-25 18:18:43.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6-npiggin/include/asm-ia64/topology.h 2005-02-25 18:56:50.000000000 +1100
@@ -42,25 +42,55 @@
void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
+#define SD_CPU_INIT (struct sched_domain) { \
+ .span = CPU_MASK_NONE, \
+ .parent = NULL, \
+ .groups = NULL, \
+ .min_interval = 1, \
+ .max_interval = 4, \
+ .busy_factor = 64, \
+ .imbalance_pct = 125, \
+ .cache_hot_time = (10*1000000), \
+ .cache_nice_tries = 2, \
+ .per_cpu_gain = 100, \
+ .cache_nice_tries = 2, \
+ .busy_idx = 2, \
+ .idle_idx = 1, \
+ .newidle_idx = 2, \
+ .wake_idx = 1, \
+ .forkexec_idx = 1, \
+ .flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
+ | SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
+ | SD_BALANCE_EXEC \
+ | SD_WAKE_AFFINE, \
+ .last_balance = jiffies, \
+ .balance_interval = 1, \
+ .nr_balance_failed = 0, \
+}
+
/* sched_domains SD_NODE_INIT for IA64 NUMA machines */
#define SD_NODE_INIT (struct sched_domain) { \
.span = CPU_MASK_NONE, \
.parent = NULL, \
.groups = NULL, \
- .min_interval = 80, \
- .max_interval = 320, \
- .busy_factor = 320, \
+ .min_interval = 8, \
+ .max_interval = 8*(min(num_online_cpus(), 32)), \
+ .busy_factor = 64, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_hot_time = (10*1000000), \
- .cache_nice_tries = 1, \
+ .cache_nice_tries = 2, \
+ .busy_idx = 3, \
+ .idle_idx = 2, \
+ .newidle_idx = 0, /* unused */ \
+ .wake_idx = 1, \
+ .forkexec_idx = 1, \
.per_cpu_gain = 100, \
.flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| SD_BALANCE_EXEC \
- | SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
- | SD_WAKE_IDLE \
+ | SD_BALANCE_FORK \
| SD_WAKE_BALANCE, \
.last_balance = jiffies, \
- .balance_interval = 1, \
+ .balance_interval = 64, \
.nr_balance_failed = 0, \
}
@@ -69,17 +99,21 @@ void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
.span = CPU_MASK_NONE, \
.parent = NULL, \
.groups = NULL, \
- .min_interval = 80, \
- .max_interval = 320, \
- .busy_factor = 320, \
- .imbalance_pct = 125, \
+ .min_interval = 64, \
+ .max_interval = 64*num_online_cpus(), \
+ .busy_factor = 128, \
+ .imbalance_pct = 133, \
.cache_hot_time = (10*1000000), \
.cache_nice_tries = 1, \
+ .busy_idx = 3, \
+ .idle_idx = 3, \
+ .newidle_idx = 0, /* unused */ \
+ .wake_idx = 0, /* unused */ \
+ .forkexec_idx = 0, /* unused */ \
.per_cpu_gain = 100, \
- .flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
- | SD_BALANCE_EXEC, \
+ .flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE, \
.last_balance = jiffies, \
- .balance_interval = 100*(63+num_online_cpus())/64, \
+ .balance_interval = 64, \
.nr_balance_failed = 0, \
}
diff -puN arch/ia64/kernel/domain.c~sched-tune-ia64 arch/ia64/kernel/domain.c
--- linux-2.6/arch/ia64/kernel/domain.c~sched-tune-ia64 2005-02-25 18:18:48.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6-npiggin/arch/ia64/kernel/domain.c 2005-02-25 18:49:43.000000000 +1100
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/topology.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
-#define SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN 6
+#define SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN 16
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/**
_
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-25 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-25 8:14 Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-02-25 18:46 ` [PATCH] random ia64 sched-domains values Chen, Kenneth W
2005-02-25 23:41 ` Nick Piggin
2005-02-26 0:25 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-02-26 0:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-02-26 0:48 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421EDE70.3010501@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.