All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch>
To: RAID Linux <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:24:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42246D1F.3070407@variant.ch> (raw)

Hi all

I have a RAID 5 array consisting of 8 300GB Maxtor SATA drives 
(6B300S0), hooked up to a Asus A8N-SLI deluxe motherboard with 4 NForce4 
SATA ports and 4 SiI 3114 ports.

see [3] for a description of what I did and more details.

each single disk in the array gives a read performance (tested with dd) 
of about 62MB/s (when reading the first 4GiB of a disk).

the array (reading the first 8GiB from /dev/md0 with dd, bs=1024K) 
performs at about 174MiB/s, accessing the array through LVM2 (still with 
bs=1024K) only 86MiB/s.

my first conclusion was to leave out the LVM2 of the loop and directly 
put a file system on /dev/md0.

however, when reading Neil Brown's article [1], I got the impression 
that my system should perform better, given the fact that each disk has 
a transfer rate of minimally 37MiB/s, maximally 65MiB/s [2].

or is there a flaw in my argumentation and the current performance is 
normal? are at last the controllers saturating?

any suggestions are welcome.

regards
nicola

[1]: http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/01102979338
[2]: http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200410/200410087B300S0-2_2.html
[3]: http://variant.ch/phpwiki/WikiBlog/2005-02-27

             reply	other threads:[~2005-03-01 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-01 13:24 Nicola Fankhauser [this message]
2005-03-01 17:53 ` non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:04   ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-01 18:12     ` Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:41       ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-02 23:08         ` dd with bytes/sec patch [was: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array] Tim Moore
2005-03-04 22:23 ` non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Matthias Julius
2005-03-06 14:25 ` Stephan van Hienen
2005-03-06 14:43   ` Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-06 17:09     ` Stephan van Hienen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42246D1F.3070407@variant.ch \
    --to=nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.