From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: visik7 Subject: Re: Crash Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:52:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4225A911.6020901@libero.it> References: <421E5923.6030103@libero.it> <421E703C.90107@libero.it> <6e7f114b716c7193981d89114bc4d65e@cl.cam.ac.uk> <421EDAED.6090602@libero.it> <4224F594.4070007@libero.it> <5069ec986de366c2de3d429d651528c5@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <5069ec986de366c2de3d429d651528c5@cl.cam.ac.uk> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Keir Fraser wrote: | | On 1 Mar 2005, at 23:07, visik7 wrote: | |> Really I can't figure how to check if I'm building agains arch/xen or |> arch/i386 |> can u help me |> thanks |> Marco | | | We've just done some comparsion of modules built against arch/i386 and | arch/xen, and decided that there isn't so much difference between them | after all. I'll add CLI/STI emulation to xen-unstable and let you know | when I;ve done that. With that support checked in your driver ought to | work. | | -- Keir | | Well I'll wait for it anyway, do I need to recompile only the hipervisor from the unstable branch or also the kernels and tools ? Thanks Marco -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCJakQihYL426P5W4RAilRAJ0SkpnKW3g/KtZbApg32EOQBFZ0hQCfSW2K 4kohoWGvBVkwkgr9HOYw59I= =5YU2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click