From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: Max mounted filesystems ? Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:26:01 -0800 Message-ID: <422691D9.5080201@osdl.org> References: <47F3C2BE74738E4683574107469DFA201DF708@XYUSEX01.xyus.xyratex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Frank Borich , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20155 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261379AbVCCEhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:37:39 -0500 To: Ian Kent In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Frank Borich wrote: > > >>118 total. When I attempt to mount the 57th one, I >>get "Too many mounted Filesystems" > > > Sorry I don't know what the limitations are for non-anonymous filesystems. > 57 seems a bit unusual though. Is that the exact error message? Can you post the kernel message log with that message in it? I can't find that message in 2.4.21 (from kernel.org) and don't have RH EL (?) to look at. Have you asked Red Hat about this? >>__________________________________________________________________________________________ >>From: Ian Kent [mailto:raven@themaw.net] >>Sent: Tue 3/1/2005 6:53 PM >>To: Frank Borich >>Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org >>Subject: RE: Max mounted filesystems ? >> >>On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Frank Borich wrote: >> >> >>>Ext2, sorry. >> >>So how many filesystems do you need mounted? >> >> >>><-----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>< >>>>>< >>><> I cannot seem to increase the maximum number of filesystems >>>>><> hat system running kernel 2.4.21-4.Elsmp. I have already tried to >>><> increase NR_SUPER in fs.h and fie-max, and file-nr in /proc/sys/fs, >>><> this does not help. When searching through documentation I see >>><> references to super-max file in /proc/sys/fs, but I do not see it on >>><> my system ? Please CC me on the reply as I am not on the list. >>>< >>>