All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@utah-nac.org>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>,
	gene.heskett@verizon.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: United States Patent: 6,862,609]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:03:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42273535.9030505@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422731B0.6040007@utah-nac.org>

Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 21:28 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>   
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 21:36, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>> Another Linux patent.....
>>>>>       
>>
>>
>> ... and another - AFAICS obvious - trivial ("prior art") patent (but I'm
>> not fluent in patent quak, I'm just a simple systems engineer).
>>
>> And one more reason to sent the European software patent directive
>> simply to hell, clarify in §52.2 to not patentability of "software"
>> discarding the word play of the patent attorneys and offices and get
>> into the head of the folks of the EPO (with whatever means are
>> necessary).
>>
>>  
>>
>>>> And that pretty much says it.  Assigned to the Canopy Group.  So SCO 
>>>> will have yet another lawsuit to threaten us with.  If they survive 
>>>>     
>>
>>
>> Apparently Canopy Group/SCO/... are not of the front of innovation since
>> "what is new on a RAID system in any way in 2005"?
>>
>>  
>>
>>>> the thrashing I've Been Moved will give them at the end of the day.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>> The way to fight the patents is for Linux developers to file their 
>>> own and start putting down stakes.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Or simply drop the whole patent system as such. Apparently it is only
>> abused to make money of the inventions of others and for sure does not
>> help innovation as such in any way (it may help the lawyers, offices and
>> companies in that area - patent utilisation - to get rich but that area
>> has nothing to do with innovation).
>>
>>     Bernd
>>  
>>
> Patent law in the US is based on section 113 of the United States 
> Constitution, and patents
> are not going away.  Live with guys.  The best way to win the patent 
                             NO.
> wars is for people
> who do Linux development to file their own patents and put some stakes 
> in the ground.
> 
> You guys keep saying, "stop the patents" but this is insanity.  It's 
> like all these big companies
> used patents like swords and are hemming linux in, and Linux stands 
> naked and defenseless.
> You guys need to get your own swords and fight -- start filing patents 
> -- go to this new law
> center "Southern Poverty Law Center" they setup I read about and get 
> these folks to start
> filing patents on Linux code (before you disclose it that is) and 
> protect yourselves.  Then
> you have ammo to negotiate cross patent agreements with MS and these 
> other companies to create a balance of power.

Morris Dees helps Linux?  That's good news.  I like the SPLC.

But I would consider checking with the (new) Software Freedom
Law Center too:  http://www.softwarefreedom.org/

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-03  2:36 [Fwd: United States Patent: 6,862,609] Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03  3:27 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-03  4:28   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03  6:21     ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-03 10:03       ` Måns Rullgård
2005-03-03 10:31       ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-03-03 11:22         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-03 15:42       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-04 19:46       ` Tom Vier
2005-03-03 10:26     ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-03-03 15:48       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03 16:03         ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-03 16:49           ` jmerkey
2005-03-03 17:39         ` James Simmons
2005-03-03 17:55           ` jmerkey
2005-03-03 20:11         ` Trever L. Adams
2005-03-03 20:31           ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-04 11:05           ` Bernd Petrovitsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42273535.9030505@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=bernd@firmix.at \
    --cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --cc=jmerkey@utah-nac.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.