All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	Injong Rhee <rhee@eos.ncsu.edu>, John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yee-Ting Li <Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netif_rx packet dumping
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:31:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42279040.5050003@ev-en.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109887386.1092.333.camel@jzny.localdomain>

jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:26, Baruch Even wrote:
> 
> 
>>NAPI was not used because it caused skews in the performance, I haven't 
>>tested it myself, just passing hearsay.
> 
> It will help to post on this list when such issues are noticed.
> It could be a simple a driver bug: such a the one posted on by Lennert 2
> days ago on e1000 NAPI - such a bug could have had serious repurcasions
> on TCP because it sat on packets in DMA occasionally upto 2 seconds.
> Seems like that bug has been sitting there for a long time.
> What kernel version? What kind of skews?
> Is it possible you tell this person to repeat the tests with 2.6.11?

I have asked around but there is no hard data to substantiate the claim 
at this time. And since then all tests were done non-NAPI style.

Kernel versions were probably 2.4.23 or some other 2.4 kernel.

Baruch

      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-03 20:38 netif_rx packet dumping Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 20:55 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:01   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:18   ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:24       ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:32         ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:54           ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 22:02             ` John Heffner
2005-03-03 22:26               ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:16                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 23:40                   ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:48                   ` Baruch Even
2005-03-04  3:45                     ` jamal
2005-03-04  8:47                       ` Baruch Even
2005-03-07 13:55                         ` jamal
2005-03-08 15:56                           ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 22:02                             ` jamal
2005-03-22 21:55                             ` cliff white
2005-03-03 23:48                   ` John Heffner
2005-03-04  1:42                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04  3:10                       ` John Heffner
2005-03-04  3:31                         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04 19:52                 ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:54                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-04 21:41                     ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:49             ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-03 22:01           ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:26 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:36   ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:44     ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:54       ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 22:04         ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:57       ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 22:14         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 15:42         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 17:00           ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:01             ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 18:09             ` David S. Miller
2005-03-08 18:18               ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:37                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-08 18:51                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-08 22:16                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:27               ` Ben Greear
2005-03-09 23:57                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-10  0:03                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-10  8:33                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-10 14:08                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-31 16:33         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 22:03   ` jamal
2005-03-03 22:31     ` Baruch Even [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42279040.5050003@ev-en.org \
    --to=baruch@ev-en.org \
    --cc=Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=rhee@eos.ncsu.edu \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.