From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Possible 'destroy' paths for conntracks? Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:14:34 +0100 Message-ID: <422C53BA.2020906@trash.net> References: <422C1FA6.5030701@expertron.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org To: Justin Schoeman In-Reply-To: <422C1FA6.5030701@expertron.co.za> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Justin Schoeman wrote: > At the moment, I am assuming that there are multiple possible paths for > a conntrack to be destroyed, and l7-filter is just missing some. Is > this true? If so, what are all the possible destructors, or is there > one single (better) place to clean up per-conntrack specific memory? Best place is probably near the call to kmem_cache_free in ip_conntrack_core. Regards Patrick