Re: compiling with 2.95

[Vincent Guffens <guffens@auto.ucl.ac.be>]

Marco Gerards wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <okuji@enbug.org> writes:
> 
> 
>>>Although I don't know if you are interrested in that or not, I'm
>>>sending some modifications about these three items that allows grub 2
>>>to be compiled with 2.95.4 (at least on my system).
>>
>>Your patch is definitely useful. But I'm not sure about unnamed union... 
>>It is not so convenient to specify union names. I think the code was 
>>written by Marco, so I'd like to hear his opinion about this.
> 
> 
> This weekend I will have a look at this.  I had the feeling it
> should've worked with gcc 2.95, but I never tried it myself.
> Hopefully I can find some box with gcc 2.95...  In the weekend I will
> try to do some other hacking as well.

I had a look in google about unnamed unions and I have seen some 
references about them with 2.95 but I was not able to compile with them. 
Maybe there is a gcc switch for them ?

Also, when compiling with an "old" system, there is this sed error message:

sed: -e expression #1, char 69: Extra characters after command

the sed version is:
$ sed -V
GNU sed version 3.02

so I have also replaced in gencmdlist.sh the following line:

#grep -v "^#" | sed -ne "/grub_register_command *( *\"/{s/.*( 
*\"\([^\"]*\)\".*/\1: $module/;p}"
grep -v "^#" | grep -e "grub_register_command *( *\"" | sed -ne 
"s/.*grub_register_command *( *\"\([^,\"]*\).*/\1: $module/;p"



-- 
				Vincent Guffens
				PhD Student UCL/CESAME
				tel:   +32 10 47 80 30
Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
"Don't bother us with politics," respond those who don't want to learn.
	      	-- Richard M. Stallman