All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: now on to tuning....
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:47:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <422EC645.1010305@variant.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6F9171BE257CA742BFBCFA87B8F20F8D030E4351@NZURC900PEX1.ubsgs.ubsgroup.net>

hi peter

peter.greis@ubs.com wrote:
> I have been lurking for a while.... I recently put together a raid 5
> system (Asus K8NE SIL 3114/2.6.8.1 kernel) with 4 300GB SATA Seagate
> drives (a lot smaller than the bulk of what seems to be on this
> list!). Currently this is used for video and mp3 storage, being
> Reiser on LVM2.

beware that LVM2 _can_ affect your performance. I too believed that the 
concept of dynamic drives is good, but I experienced a performance hit 
of about 50% (especially in sequential reads).

see my blog entry describing how I built my 2TB file-server at 
http://variant.ch/phpwiki/WikiBlog/2005-02-27 for some numbers and more 
explanation.

the K8NE has the same SiI 3114 controller as the board I used has; it is 
connected by a 33mhz 32bit PCI bus and maxes out at 133MiB/s, so for 
maxmimum performance you might want to connect only two drives to this 
controller, the other two to the nforce3 chipset SATA ports.

> Bonnie++ to test, but with which parameters ? 

normally it's enough to specify a test-file larger (e.g. twice) the 
memory capacity of the machine you are testing. for a machine with 1GiB RAM:

# bonnie++ -s 2gb {other options}

you might as well want to specify the "fast" option which skips per-char 
operations (which are quite useless to test IMHO):

# bonnie++ -f {other options}

HTH
nicola

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-09  9:22 now on to tuning peter.greis
2005-03-09  9:46 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-03-09 10:04   ` Brad Campbell
2005-03-09 10:14     ` Gordon Henderson
2005-03-09  9:47 ` Nicola Fankhauser [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-09 10:53 peter.greis
2005-03-10 19:13 ` Derek Piper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=422EC645.1010305@variant.ch \
    --to=nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.