From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: perf group <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, wangnan0@huawei.com
Subject: perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1517 bytes --]
Hello Jean, others.
Can someone please clarify the requirements for getting perf to properly
unwind the call stack on 32bit ARM v7?
Looking at [1], it seems that I need either (a) frame pointers, or (b) DWARF
debug information. Because (a) is often not available, and (b) is too large
for small flash drives on embedded - how do I use perf with split debug
information files? I.e. I have tries to record on the arm board using DWARF:
arm-v7$ perf record --call-graph dwarf ...
Then transferred the perf.data file over to my host machine. Perf archive said
that no build-id's could be found, so I'm not using that. Instead, I try to
ask perf to find the split debug packes using symfs:
x86-64$ perf report --symfs ... -g graph
But that does not work and I'm not seeing any backtraces. Stracing the report,
I don't see it even trying to access files - how can I debug this and figure
out what I'm supposed to be using?
Also according to [1], ARM .exidx unwind tables (c) are not supported by perf
- is that still the case? If so, what is holding back support for that in
perf, considering that libunwind supposedly supports unwinding using that
information?
Thanks
[1]: https://archive.fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/arm_perf/attachments/
slides/601/export/events/attachments/arm_perf/slides/601/
Fosdem_2015_perf_status_on_ARM_and_ARM64.pdf
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 21:25 Milian Wolff [this message]
2016-09-28 1:43 ` perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7 Wangnan (F)
[not found] ` <CAORVsuUB1AwtZxnNS-Z5pXdcDfrD=GWr43C=NMZsVq=CdqR5xA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-29 10:33 ` Milian Wolff
2016-09-30 7:32 ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-02 21:12 ` Milian Wolff
2016-10-04 8:41 ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-04 12:01 ` Milian Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer \
--to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.