All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: perf group <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, wangnan0@huawei.com
Subject: perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:25:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1517 bytes --]

Hello Jean, others.

Can someone please clarify the requirements for getting perf to properly 
unwind the call stack on 32bit ARM v7?

Looking at [1], it seems that I need either (a) frame pointers, or (b) DWARF 
debug information. Because (a) is often not available, and (b) is too large 
for small flash drives on embedded - how do I use perf with split debug 
information files? I.e. I have tries to record on the arm board using DWARF:

arm-v7$ perf record --call-graph dwarf ...

Then transferred the perf.data file over to my host machine. Perf archive said 
that no build-id's could be found, so I'm not using that. Instead, I try to 
ask perf to find the split debug packes using symfs:

x86-64$ perf report --symfs ... -g graph

But that does not work and I'm not seeing any backtraces. Stracing the report, 
I don't see it even trying to access files - how can I debug this and figure 
out what I'm supposed to be using?

Also according to [1], ARM .exidx unwind tables (c) are not supported by perf 
- is that still the case? If so, what is holding back support for that in 
perf, considering that libunwind supposedly supports unwinding using that 
information?

Thanks

[1]: https://archive.fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/arm_perf/attachments/
slides/601/export/events/attachments/arm_perf/slides/601/
Fosdem_2015_perf_status_on_ARM_and_ARM64.pdf

-- 
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-27 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-27 21:25 Milian Wolff [this message]
2016-09-28  1:43 ` perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7 Wangnan (F)
     [not found]   ` <CAORVsuUB1AwtZxnNS-Z5pXdcDfrD=GWr43C=NMZsVq=CdqR5xA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-29 10:33     ` Milian Wolff
2016-09-30  7:32       ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-02 21:12         ` Milian Wolff
2016-10-04  8:41           ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-04 12:01             ` Milian Wolff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer \
    --to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.