All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shai Fultheim <Shai@Scalex86.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] del_timer_sync scalability patch
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:12:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4236A6FB.2DD06AC@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.58.0503141134240.31933@server.graphe.net

Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > I suspect that del_timer_sync() in its current form is racy.
> >
...snip...
> > next timer interrupt, __run_timers() picks
> > this timer again, sets timer->base = NULL
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > 						if (timer_pending(timer))	// no, timer->base == NULL
>
> timer->base is != NULL because the timer has rescheduled itself.
> __mod_timer sets timer->bBase

Christoph, please look again. Yes, __mod_timer sets timer->base,
but it is cleared in the _next_ timer interrupt on CPU 0.

Andrew, Ingo, what do you think?

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-15  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-11 18:54 [patch] del_timer_sync scalability patch Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-11 20:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15 17:19   ` [PATCH 0/2] del_timer_sync: proof of concept Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-15 18:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15 19:41       ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-15 19:02         ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-16 16:55     ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-15 17:19   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-15 17:20   ` [PATCH 2/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-16  9:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 12:09       ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-16 13:52         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-13 13:13 ` [patch] del_timer_sync scalability patch Oleg Nesterov
2005-03-14 19:40   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15  9:12     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-03-15  8:06   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15  9:28     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 10:28     ` Oleg Nesterov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-20 23:19 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-20 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-21  0:47   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-21  1:00     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-21  0:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-21  1:17     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08  6:47 Christoph Lameter
2005-03-08  7:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08  8:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-08  8:33     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08 20:05       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-08 19:44     ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4236A6FB.2DD06AC@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=Shai@Scalex86.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=christoph@lameter.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.