All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: linux-netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize loopback stats
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:14:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4237423E.2040505@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503151459_MC3-1-989A-61A4@compuserve.com>

Chuck Ebbert wrote:

>   This patch optimizes the loopback driver's statistics by using a single
> counter for rx and tx stats instead of one for rx and one for tx.  It also
> adds unlikely() to the test for TSO since it's no longer supported by default.
> (Maybe the TSO code should be bracketed by "#if 0" ?)

Hmm, some of us want those counters separate - if this is really
needed, could it be a configurable option, please?

thanks,
Nivedita


>   o saves 84 bytes per CPU on 32bit and 168 bytes on 64 bit
>     (should save 84K data on 512-way ia64)
> 
>   o AFAICT the driver is ~2.5% faster sending PF_PACKET data
> 
>   o applies on top of Christoph's patch in -mm that removes update
>     of the device's last_rx field
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
> 
> --- 2.6.11-mm/drivers/net/loopback.c    2005-03-15 14:23:30.180677000 -0500
> +++ 2.6.11-ce/drivers/net/loopback.c    2005-03-15 14:26:23.700677000 -0500
> @@ -58,7 +58,12 @@
>  #include <linux/tcp.h>
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
>  
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct net_device_stats, loopback_stats);
> +struct loopback_device_stats {
> +       unsigned long rx_tx_bytes;
> +       unsigned long rx_tx_packets;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct loopback_device_stats, loopback_stats);
>  
>  #define LOOPBACK_OVERHEAD (128 + MAX_HEADER + 16 + 16)
>  
> @@ -126,7 +131,7 @@ static void emulate_large_send_offload(s
>   */
>  static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> -       struct net_device_stats *lb_stats;
> +       struct loopback_device_stats *lb_stats;
>  
>         skb_orphan(skb);
>  
> @@ -136,7 +141,7 @@ static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff 
>         skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  #endif
>  
> -       if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size) {
> +       if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size)) {
>                 BUG_ON(skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP));
>                 BUG_ON(skb->nh.iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP);
>  
> @@ -145,10 +150,8 @@ static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff 
>         }
>  
>         lb_stats = &per_cpu(loopback_stats, get_cpu());
> -       lb_stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> -       lb_stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> -       lb_stats->rx_packets++;
> -       lb_stats->tx_packets++;
> +       lb_stats->rx_tx_bytes += skb->len;
> +       lb_stats->rx_tx_packets++;
>         put_cpu();
>  
>         netif_rx(skb);
> @@ -168,15 +171,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *get_stat
>         memset(stats, 0, sizeof(struct net_device_stats));
>  
>         for (i=0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> -               struct net_device_stats *lb_stats;
> +               struct loopback_device_stats *lb_stats;
>  
>                 if (!cpu_possible(i)) 
>                         continue;
>                 lb_stats = &per_cpu(loopback_stats, i);
> -               stats->rx_bytes   += lb_stats->rx_bytes;
> -               stats->tx_bytes   += lb_stats->tx_bytes;
> -               stats->rx_packets += lb_stats->rx_packets;
> -               stats->tx_packets += lb_stats->tx_packets;
> +               stats->rx_bytes   += lb_stats->rx_tx_bytes;
> +               stats->tx_bytes    = stats->rx_bytes;
> +               stats->rx_packets += lb_stats->rx_tx_packets;
> +               stats->tx_packets  = stats->rx_packets;
>         }
>                                 
>         return stats;
> _
> 
> --
> Chuck
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-15 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-15 19:56 [PATCH] Optimize loopback stats Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-15 20:14 ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2005-03-15 20:49   ` Nivedita Singhvi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-15 23:15 Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-16  0:09 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-03-16  0:18   ` Nivedita Singhvi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4237423E.2040505@us.ibm.com \
    --to=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.