From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Paul Subject: Re: EGL_MESA_screen_surface proposal Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:04:38 -0700 Message-ID: <42384B06.1010901@tungstengraphics.com> References: <4236F0A8.4000004@tungstengraphics.com> <9e47339105031507064a68630f@mail.gmail.com> <4236FC79.5000909@tungstengraphics.com> <9e4733910503150828ecf5a1b@mail.gmail.com> <1110904613.9080.62.camel@lnx-1cv4-4-110> <9e47339105031520304154e567@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <9e47339105031520304154e567@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jon Smirl Cc: fbdev , Xserver development , DRI-EGL Jon Smirl wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:36:53 -0500, Michel Danzer wrote: > >>On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:28 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:17:13 -0700, Brian Paul >>> wrote: >>> >>>>Perhaps the eglShowSurface() and eglScreenMode() functions should be >>>>combined so the new surface and new display mode can be validated >>>>together. That way, the undefined state between setting the new >>>>surface and new mode can be avoided. >> >>Makes sense to me. > > > What if I just want to show another surface without changing the mode? > I could still use a combined version and since the mode matches the > mode won't actually get changed? Right. The combined function can just as well be used to change the screen's current mode _or_ current surface. You don't have to change both. -Brian