From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, riel@redhat.com,
kurt@garloff.de, Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk,
Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:48:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42386345.9020800@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DBX27-0000te-00@mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Keir Fraser wrote:
> This patch introduces a new interface function for mapping bus/device
> memory: io_remap_pfn_range. This accepts the same parameters as
> remap_pfn_range (indeed, by default it is implemented by this existing
> function) but should be used in any situation where the caller is not
> simply remapping ordinary RAM. For example, when mapping device
> registers the new function should be used.
>
> The distinction between remapping device memory and ordinary RAM is
> critical for the Xen hypervisor. This may also serve as a starting
> point for cleaning up remaining users of io_remap_page_range (in
> particular, the several sparc-specific sections in various drivers
> that use a special form of io_remap_page_range).
>
> I have audited the drivers/ and sound/ directories. Most uses of
> remap_pfn_range are okay, but there are a small handful that are
> remapping device memory (mostly AGP and DRM drivers).
>
> Of particular driver is the HPET driver, whose mmap function is broken
> even for native (non-Xen) builds. If nothing else, vmalloc_to_phys
> should be used instead of __pa to convert an ioremapped virtual
> address to a valid physical address. The fix in this patch is to
> remember the original bus address as probed at boot time and to pass
> this to io_remap_pfn_range.
I'll look over this shortly. I posted an io_remap_pfn_range() patch
to the linux-mm mailing list last week:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ultrasparc&m=111049550001120&w=2
One of the things that it needs to take into account is that
io_remap_page_range() on sparc/sparc64 has 6 parameters instead of 5.
My patch tries to remedy that...
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-16 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-16 11:49 [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 16:48 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-17 4:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-17 9:00 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42386345.9020800@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kurt@garloff.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.