From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: uclibc-dom0/xen 2.0.5 trivia Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:15:00 -0800 Message-ID: <423F2B44.7040500@diku.dk> References: <423E479D.3050809@diku.dk> <423E5D19.7050903@us.ibm.com> <423E737B.4090105@diku.dk> <423EE7BA.2040506@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <423EE7BA.2040506@us.ibm.com> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Anthony Liguori Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > root@codemonkey.ws rh# df > /xen/rockhopper.img 3963 1666 2093 45% /xen/rh > > So a bit over 1.5MB. I must admit, while the prospect of a super-small > dom0 is quite appealing, using a ramdisk just hasn't proved to be all > that useful. > > The thing that always comes back to bite me too is that I cannot get X > to start in a domU. If I could get that to work it might be practical. I guess this is more interesting when running a bunch of headless nodes. How little memory can your dom0 survive on? Jacob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click