From: Tyson Sawyer <tyson@irobot.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tyson Sawyer <tyson@irobot.com>
Subject: Possible BUG in sys_nanosleep() ?
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:10:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42407B9C.1000406@irobot.com> (raw)
I have searched archives of linux-kernel and not found any reference to
this behavior. This situation exists in both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. I'm
not quite prepared to call it a bug because I have not yet consulted
with anyone closer to the code and that is the purpose of this message:
From kernel/timer.c - sys_nanosleep():
expire = timespec_to_jiffies(&t) + (t.tv_sec || t.tv_nsec);
From include/linux/jiffies.h - timespec_to_jiffies():
/*
* The TICK_NSEC - 1 rounds up the value to the next resolution. Note
* that a remainder subtract here would not do the right thing as the
[...]
Observed problem:
Processes seem to sleep for at least 2 timer ticks even when asked to
sleep for less than 1. Specifically, on a 2.4 kernel with HZ=100, a
sleep for 5ms becomes a sleep for 20ms when 10ms is the expected behavior.
Source code inspection:
sys_nanosleep() rounds up the value returned by timespec_to_jiffies() by
adding 1 unless the requested sleep time is zero.
timespec_to_jiffies() also rounds the returned number of jiffies, except
in the case of an even number of jiffies being requested. Thus,
nanoseconds returns zero jiffies, but 1 nanosecond returns 1 jiffy.
The effect of both functions rounding up is that it is possible to sleep
for zero nanoseconds (no sleep), but otherwise 1 is added to the number
of jiffies to sleep. Thus, what should be a sleep for one jiffie (wake
up on next timer tick) becomes two jiffies (and wakes up on the 2nd
timer tick).
Conclusion:
sys_nanosleep() should never add 1 to the value of expire as
timespec_to_jiffies() already rounds up.
I post this as a question because I don't know that
timespec_to_jiffies() isn't where the behavior should be changed or
perhaps there is a good reason that I can't think of for the current
behavior.
I am not subscribed to linux-kernel. Please CC me on all replies.
Thanks!
Ty
--
Tyson D Sawyer iRobot Corporation
Lead Systems Engineer Government & Industrial Robotics
tsawyer@irobot.com Robots for the Real World
781-345-0200 ext 3329 http://www.irobot.com
reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42407B9C.1000406@irobot.com \
--to=tyson@irobot.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.