All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-2.0: privileged port connections
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:45:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4241AB34.1080700@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050323172354.GS12479@tpkurt.garloff.de>

Kurt Garloff wrote:

>Oh, that's what I was planning to do. The privileged ports are less
>scarce than the 4GB of memory that Xen-2 supports ...
>We'll hardly get running more than 64 virtual machines, I'd guess.
>  
>
Maybe not the typical desktop user but that's definitely not going to be 
the case for the enterprise user.  I do a lot of testing with small 
domUs and I routinely have 40+ domains running (16MB a piece) on my 1GB 
laptop.

On a 4GB system, with NFS in the picture, you could pretty easily 
exhaust the privileged ports with domains using between 32-64MB of 
memory (which is a pretty reasonable amount to allocate).  Throw in PAE 
support and you'll run out quickly.

Would a patch to change Xend to use pty's for consoles be accepted?  xm 
console can be invoked via ssh to support remote consoles..

>Any insight what we could do there?
>  
>
I hate to beat a dead horse, but domain sockets seem like the obvious 
thing to do.  We don't need different privilege levels there so that 
seems like the thing to do.

Regards,Anthony Liguori



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content.  Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-23 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-23 12:36 [PATCH] xen-2.0: privileged port connections Kurt Garloff
2005-03-23 15:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-03-23 16:57   ` Kurt Garloff
2005-03-23 17:03     ` Anthony Liguori
2005-03-23 17:23       ` Kurt Garloff
2005-03-23 17:45         ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2005-03-23 18:06         ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-23 17:36     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-03-24  7:31 ` David Hopwood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-23 17:43 Ian Pratt
2005-03-23 17:59 ` Ryan Harper
2005-03-24 19:06 ` Tommi Virtanen
2005-03-24 19:56   ` Anthony Liguori
2005-03-23 18:51 Ian Pratt
2005-03-23 19:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2005-03-23 21:37   ` Christian Limpach
2005-03-23 23:58     ` Kurt Garloff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4241AB34.1080700@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.