From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <42442433.8050507@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:11 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: SELinux , James Morris , Russell Coker Subject: Re: I would like to propose some kind of consolidation of tmpfs_t and tmp_t References: <4242CABC.70400@redhat.com> <1111675057.12486.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1111685458.13486.61.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <42431DB0.7040803@redhat.com> <1111757565.15280.20.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1111757565.15280.20.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: >On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:06 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > >>I don't think we have do do any of that. It seems to work if you do a >>restorecon /tmp >>in the init scripts. >> >>I am running strict policy with tmpfs mounted on /tmp >> >> > >Yes, that works as long as you have: > allow tmpfile tmpfs_t:filesystem associate; > >Right? > > > I have added that, so I am not sure if it is necessary, but with it is working with the change. Dan -- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.