Re: Problem with nasm

[Mateusz Kocielski <shm@nation.pl>]

Brian Raiter wrote:

> Try compiling with "gcc -nostartfiles -o exit exit.o" instead, and see
> if you get different results. If so, then gcc probably knows of some
> extra arguments that ld needs to produce a proper executable. Whenever
> feasible, you should let gcc do the linking for you instead of
> invoking ld directly. ld can take a lot of cmdline arguments.
> 
> The "-nostartfiles" option will tell gcc not to supply a _start
> routine, and not to link in the usual C libraries. You will probably
> still get a slightly bigger executable than if you invoked ld
> directly, but not by much.

$ nasm -felf -o exit.o exit.s
$ gcc -nostartfiles -o exit exit.o
$ strace ./exit
.
.
.
_exit(0)                                = ?

It works ok, thank you very much.

-- 
Shm - shm ( at ) irc7 ( dot ) pl
EKG: 2099452  JID: shm@chrome.pl
homepage : http://shm.nation.pl/