From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] ext3 perf patch#4
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:51:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4247FDBE.2010306@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050328034838.GI30963@colo.lackof.org>
Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:49:06PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
> ...
>
>># time rsync -a /Debian-apt/SRC/linux-2.6.12-rc1-pa4-050327 /Sources/CVS-tst
>>
>>real 3m34.512s
>>user 1m0.730s
>>sys 1m6.440s
>
>
> Joel,
> thanks for the data!
>
> But I don't know what it means.
> Was the performance bad for that box before?
>
:-)
No just looks like as before:
# uname -a
Linux hpalin 2.6.12-rc1-pa1-c110 #2 Sat Mar 19 23:36:05 CET 2005 parisc GNU/Linux
# time rsync -a /Debian-apt/SRC/linux-2.6.12-rc1-pa4-050327 /Sources/CVS-tst
real 3m44.365s
user 1m0.350s
sys 1m11.120s
>
>>I prefer simply tar and so:
>># cd /Debian-apt/SRC
>># time tar -cslpf /chroot/Develop/linux-2.6.12-rc1-pa4.tar2
>>linux-2.6.12-rc1-pa4-050327
>>
>>real 0m38.487s
>>user 0m3.690s
>>sys 0m18.650s
>>
>>a sample iostat too :-)
>>avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %iowait %idle
>> 15.70 0.00 47.00 37.30 0.00
>>
>>Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
>>sda 2.50 0.00 19.60 0 196
>>sdb 297.30 5906.40 89.20 59064 892
>>sdc 15.10 0.00 7712.80 0 77128
>
> ...
>
> That looks fine.
>
Yes, sorry for confusion (I would just show that it works and nothing was broken)
...
>
> I probably should have posted that speculation to the mailing list
> instead of in the commit log...I was quite tired at that point.
>
Don't wory I would have to be disturbe or confused by the song of a bird in the garden ?-)
(the 32bit bug has obviously nothing to do with that)
> That could only be true if ext3 perf issue only shows up in 64-bit kernels.
> I don't recall if anyone posted perf results for 32-bit kernels.
>
TBH, the 2 64bit system I have the oportunity to test (b2k up, n4k smp) are so confortable (well n4k ask many time for self test on
reboot) from speed point of view that I never noticed ext[23] lack of perf ;-)
Thanks,
Joel
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-28 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-26 10:35 [parisc-linux] ext3 perf patch#2 Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <42454E7C.3050509@tiscali.be>
2005-03-26 21:39 ` Grant Grundler
2005-03-27 1:18 ` [parisc-linux] ext3 perf patch#4 Grant Grundler
2005-03-27 13:49 ` Joel Soete
2005-03-28 3:48 ` Grant Grundler
2005-03-28 12:51 ` Joel Soete [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4247FDBE.2010306@tiscali.be \
--to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.