From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
Subject: Re: status of netfilter+ipsec patches
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:58:00 -0800
Message-ID: <424853B8.9090607@shorewall.net>
References: <42289633.6020804@sysgo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
In-Reply-To: <42289633.6020804@sysgo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Hi!
> I read in the archives of this ml that the netfilter+ipsec patches were
> supposed to be submitted after 2.6.10 release.
> 
> Are there any open issues? What keeps them from going into the main kernel?
> 

I second this question -- I'm giving a presentation about Shorewall and
IPSEC next month at Linuxfest Northwest and I'd like to be able to give
the audience the current status of the patches.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ teastep@shorewall.net
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key