From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2005@gmx.net>
Subject: ACCOUNT target future (pkttables)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:16:03 +0200
Message-ID: <424A7C63.1050705@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Hi,

I'm currently writing an ACCOUNT target for ebtables and I feel really
uncomfortable in duplicating the existing iptables ACCOUNT code, adding
a few tweaks and releasing it as ebtables ACCOUNT target. The tweaks
would be:
- efficient handling of sparsely poulated networks
- accounting by MAC address
- 64bit counters (optional)
- saturated counters (optional)
- choice of what to count (layer 2/3 length, packets, src/dst)

Some time ago, I found notes from a netfilter developer workshop about
future directions (reducing code duplication, switching to pkttables...)
and my work would counteract your plans to reduce code duplication. Is
there any working code using the new framework and does it make sense
for me to write my code only for the new framework (will that be merged
eventually into mainline)?


Regards,
Carl-Daniel
-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/