From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <424AEC00.9000502@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:12:16 +0300 From: Heikki Lindholm MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] RE: RTAI/fusion 0.7 References: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D505935@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D505935@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid Errors-To: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Fillod Stephane Cc: rtai@domain.hid, rtai-dev@domain.hid, adeos-main@gna.org Fillod Stephane kirjoitti: > Hi Philippe, > > Kudos for the RTAI/fusion 0.7 release! > You (the team) are doing an astounding work. > > [snip] > >>o The Adeos support used in fusion has been upgraded to final releases, > > >>namely r9/x86 and r6/ppc. Upgrading is strongly recommended, especially > > >>if CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled in your kernel config, which is likely > > with > >>fusion. Also note that Adeos PPC is now rebased on mainline (2.6.10 >>actually). > > > Please find attached a patch of Adeos r6/ppc against 2.6.11. > I hope I've got it right. Please let me know if it would need > the spinlock fix in i386-r10c1. The patch seemed ok, but the kernel isn't. There's a bug that causes the plain kernel schedule while in atomic region (see http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2005-March/018497.html ) I don't know if this affects embedded archs, but anything using entry.S seems to be affected. I wouldn't use 2.6.11 on ppc32. -- Heikki Lindholm