All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mvw@planets.elm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:09:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424C5912.90607@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050331150548.GC19294@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>

Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 March 2005 23:39:40 -0800, Yum Rayan wrote:
> 
>>Before patch
>>------------
>>check_free_space - 128
>>do_acct_process - 105
>>
>>After patch
>>-----------
>>check_free_space - 36
>>do_acct_process - 44
> 
> 
> It is always nice to see enthusiams, but in your case it might be a
> bit misguided.  None of the functions you worked on appear to be real
> problems wrt. stack usage.

Yes, this is similar to what I was about to write.
It would be more useful to tackle the really large stack consumers
or ones in deep call chains.

> But if you have time to tackle some of these functions, that may make
> a real difference:
> 
> http://wh.fh-wedel.de/~joern/stackcheck.2.6.11
> 
> In principle, all recursive paths should consume as little stack as
> possible.  Or the recursion itself could be avoided, even better.  And
> some of the call chains with ~3k of stack consumption may be
> problematic on other platforms, like the x86-64.  Taking care of those
> could result in smaller stacks for the respective platform.

Here is 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 raw checkstack output on x86-64:
http://developer.osdl.org/~rddunlap/doc/checkstack1.out

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-31 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-31  7:39 [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Yum Rayan
2005-03-31 15:05 ` Jörn Engel
2005-03-31 20:09   ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-31 20:40     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:30   ` Stack usage tasks Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:43     ` Roland Dreier
2005-03-31 21:19       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-01 10:17         ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-01 11:16           ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-03 11:35 ` [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Olaf Dietsche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424C5912.90607@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mvw@planets.elm.net \
    --cc=yum.rayan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.