From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: problem with netfront.c Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:06:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4250AF21.8040909@diku.dk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Pratt wrote: > ******************************************************************************** > A Rough Introduction to Using Grant Tables > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Christopher Clark, March, 2005. > This looks quite interesting. Is there anything written up about the motivations for this design, and how it compares to other similar mechanisms, say, L4's grant-via-IPC system? Are the grant references capabilities, or how do you prevent domains from inventing their own? Who takes care of garbage-collecting them when a domain exists or dies? Can a domain DoS a Xen-system by allocating all the grant refs in the system? best, Jacob