From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:31:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Help please with tc and iptables mark Message-Id: <425141C8.8070506@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <200504041206.35593.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com> In-Reply-To: <200504041206.35593.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Adrian Turcu wrote: > Hello list members, > > Finaly I'm here after a week of trying to subscribe to this list... pfew... > > Anyway... I have a rather strange problem with tc. I am trying to police the > ingress traffic into my network using the iptables MARK feature (in mangle > table, PREROUTING) but it seems that tc filters ignore this marks and they > don't work at all for me. Let me explain a bit more in detail: There is alot of work going on with tc at the moment - There are/will be lots more matches and the ability to run iptables commands from filters. > > I have a server behind my linux-firewall box (firewall is with 2.6.10 kernel > custom build, I think with 2.6.10 you can still get the behaviour you want if you don't select packet action in Qos and/or fair queuing of config - you get to select a different policer then. CONFIG_NET_CLS_POLICE is the one you want if the other doesn't disappear de select it aswell. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc