From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (RT-soft-2.Moscow.itn.ru [80.240.96.70]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E14967A2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:52:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42517236.70707@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:58:30 +0400 From: Andrei Konovalov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Denk References: <20050404164545.E603CC108D@atlas.denx.de> In-Reply-To: <20050404164545.E603CC108D@atlas.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Jon Masters , Sylvain Munaut , Linux PPC Embedded list , Jakob Viketoft Subject: Re: Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys model...] List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <42511D55.4040507@ru.mvista.com> you wrote: > >>Should we rely on U-Boot to give that device tree structure to >>the kernel? If I got it correct this is how the Freescale team >>plans to proceed. Jon (Masters), are you going the same way? > > > Who said this, and where? I am not aware of such a discussion. These are just plans: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-April/017561.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys model...] Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:55:42 -0600 From: Jon Loeliger Oh, yeah. Um, also on my plate will be to construct the original flat-tree blob in U-Boot to be handed to the kernel. (I'll start with 85xx and 83xx, naturlich.) -------- End Original Message -------- Thanks, Andrei > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk >