From: Francisco Pereira <fpereira@lojan.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Qos with 2 internet connections problems
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:36:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425312F0.2090807@lojan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4252AD8C.7000401@ideagroup.co.uk>
Anthony Letchet wrote:
> Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which
> are working great) and we are running NAT.
> Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads
> from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a
> crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it
> to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what i
> wanted, i obviously had to customize this slightly to get my other
> connection to be shaped as well.
> my connections are 2 adsl connections running at 512kbit:256kbit, i
> compiled the kernel with all the tos + iptables stuff (eventually) so
> that the script ran without any errors, once it had i did a download on
> each pipe and then tried to ping jolt.co.uk and google.co.uk, jolt.co.uk
> normally is about 15ms, so i was hoping that it would maybe be 200ms
> with my new shaping, but it was coming at about 900ms+ google was the
> same. Browsing other website was also to a crawl (what i was trying to
> avoid) but i did notice that when traffic came from our mail server
> through my gateway it was only receiving at about 25k/sec instead of
> 2mb/sec etc as its on a 100mbit switch. So something was obviously
> shaping, so i suppose i will now need to look in to specifying some of
> the hosts which are local to me but are on the outside interfaces and
> for them not to be shaped.. But still no better off :(
>
> Ive been reading various howtos like the adsl bandwith management howto,
> but these havnt been updated in about 3 years and they mention various
> techniques which were being tried back then to help with these kind of
> situations, so what i really want is a howto which shows all these new
> features? or is this adsl bandwith management still current ? :)
>
I would recommend reading the masters thesis of Jesper Dangaard Brouer
at http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/
Altough he didnt release software yet (there is some code & patches in
the pdf file) which could lead to the best solution, you could estimate
the adsl overhead with real knowledge, and not like it says in some
scripts (put x kbit less than the link bandwith, or 5% less,...)
> my network diagram
>
> Lan machines -> Linux Router -> Alcatel Router -> ADSL
> Lan Machine -> linux router -> alcatel router2 -> ADSL
>
> Alcatel router -> Linux router
> Alcatel router -> mail server etc
>
>
>
>
> my modified wondershaper script is below: if anyone could point out some
> errors and or maybe point me to somewhere where i could learn how to do
> what i want better please let me know.
>
>
>
> #!/bin/bash -x
> # Wonder Shaper
> # please read the README before filling out these values
> #
> # Set the following values to somewhat less than your actual download
> # and uplink speed. In kilobits. Also set the device that is to be shaped.
>
> DOWNLINKQ2
> UPLINK%6
Too much. Because ATM overhead (5/53), 463/231 is the actual maximum
bandwith.
And you have yet to consider the per packet overhead. Read the thesis I
mentioned.
> DEV=eth1
> DEV2=eth2
>
> DOWNLINKlanQ2
> UPLINKlan%6
> DEVlan=eth1
>
Did you use the DEVlan variable?
eth1 is LAN and external at the same time?
Have you looked at http://routeskeeper.sourceforge.net/
or http://selab.edu.ms/twiki/bin/view/Networking/RoutesKeeperProject
Regards,
Francisco.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 15:23 [LARTC] Qos with 2 internet connections problems Anthony Letchet
2005-04-05 22:36 ` Francisco Pereira [this message]
2005-04-05 23:08 ` Jason Boxman
2005-04-06 13:39 ` Andy Furniss
2005-04-06 13:43 ` Andy Furniss
2005-04-06 15:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2005-06-25 21:08 ` Per Marker Mortensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425312F0.2090807@lojan.com \
--to=fpereira@lojan.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.