From: Pedro Monjo Florit <pedro.monjo@futurlink.com>
To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] malloc & free
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:12:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112554711.8263.13.camel@pegasus>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2051 bytes --]
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>
>>In the application I am developing, I want to log some information about
>>Bluetooth devices, pretty much like "sdptool browse" and "hcitool info"
>>do. In the code of these applications, there are calls to some library
>>functions like hci_dflagstostr(), hci_lmtostr()... that create a string
>>with information about the device (flags, features, etc.).
>>
>>The problem with these functions is that they call malloc(), expecting
>>the caller to call free(). The problem with that is that this approach
>>is not save, as it is not guaranteed that calling malloc() in a library
>>function and free() in the main program works. In fact, I have seen a
>>segmentation fault doing that.
>>
>
>explain why this is not safe.
>
I am not an expert in these issues, but I have read many times that
there is no guarantee that the malloc/free implementation is the same in
the main program and in the libraries. This is due to how the different
modules are compiled: compiler version, compile flags, etc. But, as I
said, I am not 100% sure. I am quite sure that I have read this for
Windows, but maybe (probably) Linux is different.
>
>>AFAIK, there are two alternatives: either the library functions expect a
>>buffer (and its size) to be filled or malloc() and free() are both done
>>within the library, which means creating a new library function call for
>>freeing buffers allocated with malloc(). Are any of this alternatives
>>implemented or on the roadmap? What workaround do you suggest?
>>
>
>We can do that, but it is not on my roadmap. Send my patches for it and
>I will review them.
The easiest way to do it (and to continue with the actual API without
modifications) would be to have a function call like:
void hci_str_free(char *str)
{
free(str);
}
So after a call to hci_dflagstostr() (for example), the resulting
pointer should be freed with hci_str_free(). In any case, there is one
exception: hci_dtypetostr(); it returns a pointer to static data.
Cheers,
Pedro
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2693 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 16:30 [Bluez-users] malloc & free Pedro Monjo Florit
2005-04-03 18:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-04-06 7:12 ` Pedro Monjo Florit [this message]
2005-04-06 7:33 ` Xavier Garreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com \
--to=pedro.monjo@futurlink.com \
--cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.