From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:25 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] Re: ADSL overhead patch Message-Id: <42541351.1060700@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Hmm, I just googled/looked at Ed Wildgoose's patch, and I is not > correct/precise. You can read why my patch is correct/precise in > Section 6.1.2 of the Thesis (which gives a description of the patch). Yes it was always not quite perfect - but it was safe - a cell too safe Ed knew this. I just made one for UK like you do it - but nowhere near as comprehensivly - It doesnt do mpu/overhead as just assumes you already hacked whatever calls rtab to be aal5_len - 1, which as you say is just one line in htb. > > >> Mine is for UK pppoatm but if you know your overheads it's easy to >> modify - Do you? there are tables in the doc linked to. > > > In Chapter 5, I have tried to summarize the different types of > encapsulation methods and their according overheads, for easy reference. > > Is is still a problem figuring out, which type of encapsulation your > specific ADSL connection is using... Yes I agree it can look confusing, life is easier if like me you have a modem that gives a cell count and a quiet link. It's just a case of sending various sized pings then. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc