From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: question on inline assembly and long long values
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:26:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425429BF.1050706@nortel.com> (raw)
I want to retrieve the msr (which is 64-bits) on a 970 when running in
32-bit mode. I have the following bit of code that seems to work, but
when looking at the code it always seems to use a suboptimal register
for the low word, and then it ends up having to copy it to the right
register to create a long long register pair.
static inline unsigned long long get_msr()
{
union {
struct {
unsigned long low;
unsigned long high;
} words;
unsigned long long val;
} val;
asm volatile( \
"mfmsr %0 \n\t" \
"rldicl %1,%0,32,32 \n\t" \
"rldicl %0,%0,0,32 \n\t" \
: "=r" (val.words.low), "=r" (val.words.high));
return val.val;
}
Using this code, the optimised assembly output of
unsigned long long a = asdf();
unsigned long long b = asdf();
is
mfmsr 5
rldicl 0,5,32,32
rldicl 5,5,0,32
mr 6,0
mfmsr 7
rldicl 9,7,32,32
rldicl 7,7,0,32
mr 8,9
I figure it should have been able to use registers 6/8 in the first
place, and save the extra moves.
Is there any way to help gcc optimise this?
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-06 18:26 Chris Friesen [this message]
2005-04-06 19:16 ` question on inline assembly and long long values Kumar Gala
2005-04-06 20:01 ` Chris Friesen
2005-04-06 21:18 ` Gabriel Paubert
2005-04-06 21:37 ` Chris Friesen
2005-04-06 23:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-06 23:30 ` Chris Friesen
2005-04-06 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-06 23:56 ` Chris Friesen
2005-04-06 23:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-07 0:09 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425429BF.1050706@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.