All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:57:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42543123.3080905@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com>



David Mosberger wrote:

>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:33:07 +0200, Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch> said:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>  Andreas> But the driver in questions is 3w-9xxx and there have been
>  Andreas> no chances at all in this driver between 2.6.10 and
>  Andreas> 2.6.12-rc1. The changed driver in -rc2 still has the
>  Andreas> problem.  And I've tried the driver built-in and as a
>  Andreas> module (default)...
>
>Are you sure the problem is due to the driver and not RAID0?  What if
>you dd directly from the underlying device?
>
>  
>
To make sure it's not the md/raid I just took the driver/md directory 
from 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 and used it in 2.6.11 => no change in behaviour ...
(The changes in md.c are minor and there are no changes in raid0.c 
between .10 and .11 anyway)

As I say on the webpage, a dd on the underlying devices works fine...

It might still be a higher level interface to the md, that's wrong.

And I'm not saying that it's the 3w-9xx driver!! It hasn't changed 
between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11, so pretty much impossible to introduce bugs 
there...
(It was just mentioned wrt to the fusion-mpt driver.)

Andreas

>	--david
>
>  
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 20:25 [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-05 20:43 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Rob Fowler
2005-04-06  2:13 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  4:45 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-06  4:53 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  5:10 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  5:56 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06  7:29 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:30 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:32 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  7:34 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  8:33 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 16:58 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 18:57 ` Andreas Hirstius [this message]
2005-04-06 21:50 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42543123.3080905@cern.ch \
    --to=andreas.hirstius@cern.ch \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.